If You’re Gonna Use Hax$’s Corpse for Content, At Least Tell the Truth

Abdulaziz “Hax$” Al-Yami, a lauded Super Smash Bros. Melee player, died last month. The details are murky, but it seems to stem from complications related to a prior suicide attempt last year. I won’t eulogize the man; I didn’t know him, and all I can really attest to is that he was a prominent player for Melee for many many years, notably being a shining example of the power of ergonomic controllers. To be quite honest,  that’s about all the nice things I have to say, as my impressions were mostly negative. That’s not me being callous or cruel, just honest – like many, my major memory of Al-Yami was the very public downfall he had in 2021. After spending the better part of 3 months launching a bizarre harassment campaign against another player, William “Leffen” Hjelte, Al-Yami was banned from the vast majority of Melee events, a decision that would end up permanent. It is impossible to fully sum up that situation with any sort of brevity, so the best I can do is link you to my prior blog on the matter.

In the back of my head, I always had a feeling that there was something dark beneath the surface of this event, and eventually I was proven right. It has since mostly been scrubbed from the internet, but a close friend of Al-Yami wrote a desperate plea regarding his mental state around this time last year. A 2-week stay in a psychiatric ward following a long spiral would lead to a clinic diagnosis of bipolar disorder, a trait he allegedly inherited genetically from his father. I grappled with conflicting feelings upon hearing that revelation, as I found it impossible to view the situation without that critical context. When it was revealed in August that Al-Yami had made an attempt on his life, which left him an amputee, things had already spun far out of control for any one individual person or group to resolve the matter.

Suffice to say, many do not share my more nuanced view. If you dare to check social media, you may find yourself caught in the crossfire of an ensuing war regarding who is to blame for Al-Yami’s death, as if he was in fact murdered by someone tangible you could point to and shame on the internet. What you won’t see from any of these pigs – for that is what they are, squealing hogs who don’t give a single shit about the very real person that died – is an acknowledgement of the real culprit, which has been staring us in the face for some time. Ever since the revelation of his diagnosis, I found myself looking back into Al-Yami’s long public history online, which started in his teenage years all the way to his death. What I found is someone whose mental decline had slowly taken root as he aged into an adult, as bipolar disorder often does, leading to many instances of irrational, self-destructive behavior. Far from the scheming of a narcissistic mastermind, this history speaks to someone who was struggling, unable to cope, and using the uncritical admiration he earned online from his genuine talent at video games as a panacea that ultimately fed into the illness that was eating away at him.

There will be many who seek to martyr Al-Yami as someone who was publicly humiliated and shamed into suicide despite being totally innocent, and some who will be repulsed by the bad behavior while entirely dismissing that he had spent many years in a sustained mental health crisis. I’m of the opinion that the only way to truly respect someone’s life is to acknowledge the fullness of who they were, and not a facsimile churned out by hate machines. These reductive hero and villain narratives might get attention on social media but do a great disservice to a real human who died fighting something that he could not control and didn’t ask for, that consumed his life even as he appeared to be of sound mind.


There was a passage in the post that Al-Yami’s friend wrote regarding his state of mind that I believe bookends both halves of this story:

For Al-Yami, being “Hax$” clearly meant being a technical wizard at Melee, meticulously studying the game down to its molecules and dissecting it into a prism through which only he could see. This is embodied in the meme which became an important fixture to the “Hax$” brand: “20XX,” the distant year in a dark future where only high-tier characters played to machine-level perfection were competing at tournaments. 

This half-scholarly half-shitpost mindset proved a fine veil over what was, truthfully, an obsessive strive for perfection. If Al-Yami had grown up (he was 14 when he first started competing in Melee) believing life and the game to be two sides of the same coin, a demerit on his knowledge was as serious as a threat to his life. At least, that’s the only way that could explain his years-long feud with fellow Melee legend William “Leffen” Hjelte.

Hjelte was hardly a force for good on the old Smashboard forums, not too dissimilar to the many unsupervised middle schoolers who barked online to satisfy the common teenage urge to be obnoxious. Insulting the rest of the board’s population for their inferior thought processes was like breathing air to Hjelte, and he spared no expense for Al-Yami either.

His words were not received well, to put it lightly. 

Now you might say that I have cherry-picked out some comments from Hjelte that weren’t that bad, or that Al-Yami was merely lashing out after years of sustained insults. Neither is true, I assure you – Hjelte was crude and rude, particularly to his fellow countrymen, but they all have a very familiar, sneering logicbro archetype to them, talking about facts over feelings, rather than, say, someone’s character. The inciting incident that Al-Yami mentions in his post above is, in fact, the very same post from Leffen you see right before that image, originally posted a few months prior. ‘Misinformed’ and ‘close-minded’ hardly seem like the type of jabs that would facilitate calling someone a future serial-killer, mentally unstable, or a response with “ridiculous amounts of unnecessary violence and anger”. I find one particular line quite telling: Al-Yami insists that Hjelte likes to call out why people ‘fail at life’ over attacking their arguments.

Indeed, Hjelte did frequently call people bad at the game, a common complaint against him, and one I do find unnecessarily rude and obnoxious, a Leffen trademark. What is difficult to see, however, is any notable instance where Hjelte’s childish insults rose to the level of telling Al-Yami that he was pathetic at life, as implied. Let’s revisit what Al-Yami’s friend had to say:

It is difficult to look back at these unreasonably angry forum posts – the personal attacks, the constant conflating of game knowledge to worthiness as a person, and so on – and not see that what was a flippant and cutting remark about game knowledge was an immense personal attack to Al-Yami due to an unhealthy hyper-fixation on his ability to play the game. So intense was this fixation that it would spawn a years-long spiral in which Al-Yami would characterize these kinds of posts as “stalking” and “harassment” of the highest order. 

It’s important to note, too, that I have little doubt that Al-Yami truly believed this. After all, he was experiencing signs of what he would characterize as “PTSD”: insomnia, depression, and an inability to think of Hjelte without being medically triggered. As far back as 2015, Al-Yami was posting publicly about how his insomnia was so bad that he was awake for 72 hours straight at tournaments, a condition he blamed on Hjelte “stalking” him. At the same time, he was so hyper-fixated on Melee that he was playing fifteen hours a day while guzzling ibuprofen because he had developed arthritis – at just 21 years old – from using the infamously junky Gamecube controller. His brain apparently never stops thinking, never lets him get a moment’s rest.

I think Al-Yami’s bipolar disorder was blooming as he finished adolescence, rather than his initial characterization of PTSD. Insomnia, depressive cycles, and hypomanic fixations are all common symptoms of the illness. Hyperfixation and rumination are also fairly common symptoms of bipolar disorder, manifesting in both types of mood cycles. Ruminating, in particular, tends to occur in depressive cycles, and is often characterized as an unsettled mind that continuously loops back to prior events to obsessive degrees. The fact that, nearly ten years later, Al-Yami would continuously cite these forum posts as traumatic incidents in his life, so much so that he would make literal hours of video content about them and endlessly repeat the same talking points over and over for years afterwards, was likely a sign of such ruminating thoughts. 

As his playing career began to initially grind to a halt because of his injuries, even more erratic and reckless behavior emerged in the desperate attempt to get back in the game. There are no less than three different hardware engineers and consultants working in ergonomic fighting game controllers that ran into the same pattern: Al-Yami approaches about the product, playtests a demo, immediately demands partnerships and equity for his consultation, doesn’t get exactly what he wants, then bails onto a new engineer, prototypes and plans from his previous debacle in hand ready to share because there are no patents or contracts involved. Al-Yami was not a hardware engineer, he was not an ergonomics expert, and he had very little capital to invest in R&D, being a high-school graduate who never held a real job. Yet continuously, for what appeared to be no discernible reason, Al-Yami demanded that his legacy and name be front and center for any of these products, despite not even coming up with the name for his aforementioned product:

The last engineer was smart enough to hook him to a contract so he couldn’t do the same maneuvers as before, and it was litigated before a court. Even under oath, Al-Yami has a difficult time reconciling with the fact that he had partners in these endeavors who did the lion’s share of the work. There was a brief time the court records and transcripts of Al-Yami’s questioning were put online, and they show complete nonsense answers regarding the incongruities.

When he first contacted the company Hitbox, there was a phrase that kept recurring as he tried to explain to them that he needed a major partnership with their company after 2 and a half days of testing their demo product:

“A second lease on life”. Maybe said in good-natured hyperbole, but let’s return to what his friend Darkgenex said one more time:

Like a dying man trying to find water, Al-Yami sought to preserve him playing Melee again, and even the narrative of how that came to be, at all costs. For no real reasons he continuously burned bridges with sympathetic hardware engineers, and would baselessly accuse Leffen of conducting some type of espionage in order to “kill his career” by trying it out. A grand narrative, of world importance, what some would call a delusion, was built to hold up the fragile truth that unless Al-Yami could be seen as a major contributor to Melee, he had no life to live. And he was willing to act in erratic, alienating ways in order to keep that delusion alive.


This may come as a surprise, but all of the events described up to now are prior to the release of his “Evidence.zip 2” video, in which he accused Hjelte, a longtime choice for his obsessive rumination, of committing crimes such as conspiring to accuse someone of sexual exploitation of a minor, and that he was a Hitlerian menace bent on destruction who needed to be destroyed. Some months after the release and the initial wave of endless reinterpretation and (self-admitted) “PR” apology videos, Al-Yami would admit that during the course of making “Evidence.zip 2” he was drinking heavily – another recurring fact and a common side-effect of severe mental health issues – and that a psychiatrist had determined that he was in a state of psychosis when he was rushing out those videos. 

Much has been made of the fact that Al-Yami was banned from most major NA Melee tournaments for the release of those videos. I don’t personally think there’s much to relitigate there – it is generally considered uncouth and extremely damaging to make baseless claims of illegal behavior of another player, and that level of harassment has almost always never been allowed. And while I believe his psychotic state mattered in describing the context, actions have consequences, and ultimately the responsibility of managing symptoms of mental health crises landed on him. 

As we now know, the sobriety and psychiatric care necessary to soothe those symptoms was not consistent enough to stave off the worst outcome. Despite being told that he could attend local tournaments again after being banned, Al-Yami would once again make videos accusing Hjelte of crimes after he was privately warned, even past a first warning, to not do so again. Feeling they had no choice, his local organizers reinstated his ban, at which point his health spiraled to its lowest point. Months of drinking, psych ward stays, and harassment of local TO’s would ensue, even as many tried to help him break the cycle. One year later, he would be dead.

First and foremost, dying at the age of 30 after countless mental health struggles is a tragedy that is difficult to put to words. Even worse, it is a story that is heard all too commonly amongst those who do suffer from severe mental health crises – the years of uncertainty, years lost to hazy dissociative fog, countless burned bridges and broken hearts. Al-Yami needed help, and we are slowly being made aware that there were so many kind people who did try to privately help him through these crises of his own making. Yet cruelly, overcoming a mental health disorder is both something you can’t do alone and yet, paradoxically, can only be overcome by you choosing to change, to recognize that it must be done. 

But of course, instead of trying to better understand the horrible disease that he was afflicted with without his consent and that drove him to destructive habits, the conversation has almost entirely been focused on “who” killed Al-Yami. As if his mental health crisis was inflicted on him only recently and not something he’d clearly been struggling with for nearly a decade. As if there is a logic to his actions that could be easily understood as sober and calculating. 

I’m sure I’ll be accused of it anyways, but I’ll state for the record that it is not my intent to smear a dead man, a dead son, a dead brother. One of the sickest aspects of something like bipolar disorder is that it has many quiet sufferers, who toss and turn in bed as their brains simply overwhelm any natural defense they have. We have medications that help, but they are both lifesavers and not good enough – the effort necessary to sustain any degree of normalcy is far too great to be asked of any one person, and yet they must persist. Many sick people are aware that they are sick, as Al-Yami frequently alluded to, but have no way to cope with the pain and the shame. Those flaws don’t make him weak, or a bad person; it makes him achingly, horribly human.

In better times, it was clear that Al-Yami was an enthusiastic and fun person to be around, and there was genuine appreciation for his talents, and real innovations in the community that were advanced by dedicated people like him. I have no doubt that the nice things people are saying after his death are true, and my goal is not to take away from those memories or say they aren’t part of the person that was Abdulaziz Al-Yami. But it is important to understand that, more than good or bad, his life was complex and full of the contradictions and tragedies that make up all human life, not just fodder for culture vultures who are more interested in a political agenda than telling the truth. 

And that truth is that believing that only Melee tournaments could have saved his life is the behavior of an enabler. Believing that his mental health problems were rapid and onset is the behavior of an enabler. Not acknowledging that he suffered from bipolar disorder is the behavior of an enabler. Enabling hurts everyone, and the only way to break that cycle is to see it for what it is.

There has been endless discourse about the state of men’s mental health, and how it isn’t taken seriously and/or ignored. So I’ll end by asking this – in what way does diminishing the harm of the very real mental health disorder Al-Yami suffered from help men’s mental health? How does flattening Al-Yami’s life into a 3 year period after years of symptoms help men’s mental health? What does harassing people who did their best under extremely difficult circumstances do to help men’s mental health?

100 responses to “If You’re Gonna Use Hax$’s Corpse for Content, At Least Tell the Truth”

  1. Thank you for writing this

    Liked by 1 person

    1. For writing a piece that attacks the character of somebody who died just 2 weeks ago? It starts all nice and compassionate, oh he’s mentally ill, and then the post is straight-up character asssinastion when writing about the b0xx.

      By the way thank you Duffy for shadow banning everybody on r/ssbm who has anything disagreeable to say about how Hax was treated by his own community. Even going so far as to lock the thread that this blogpost was shared via to stifle any discussion.

      Just because you get tired of trying to gaslight people in the comments doesn’t mean you need to suppress conversation. No rules were being broken, no justification for shadowbans or locked threads.

      Like

      1. r/ssbm locks all posts about controversies. That’s a stated rule. In fact they allowed the post to stay up for most of a day before locking it.

        Also shadow banning isn’t a thing. If a mod is unhappy they just ban you.

        Guy who thinks Hax was a angel and no one is allowed talk about the facts of what happened. You cant even deny it didn’t happen. In fact it almost its basically a geruntee you believe misinformation about even basic facts. Like why was Hax perma banned? It was because recanted his apology and restate his original claims. Not because Hax dared speak about his ban. Why was Hax only partially unbanned? Because Hax kept defending his original videos while arguing to TO’s why he should be unbanned the entire time.

        These facts are easy to look up.

        Like

  2. so he had some spats with engineers and was traumatized by someone who was considered a psychopath by other evidence.zip contributors and he deserved to be eternally banned because of that?

    Like

    1. Rationalmangofan Avatar
      Rationalmangofan

      It’s like you didn’t even read the article dude, you gotta be less emotionally invested so you can see the big picture here. Maybe read the part about enablers again.

      Like

      1. I’m not denying that Hax was bipolar or had serious mental health issues, and I obviously recognize that his sense of self shouldn’t have been so wrapped up in Melee. But beyond the original evidince.zip video, which did require some punishment, there was nothing done that warranted such a prolonged ban ban.

        Leffen himself has harassed other players, and the idea in this article that Leffen didn’t attack others on a personal level is insane when we have so much documented evidence of him doing just that currently and in the original evidence.zip documents.

        It’s insulting to tell someone that you know what’s best for their mental health, deny them from what they love based on this arbitrary conclusion, watch them die as a result of their mental health deteriorating from this exclusion, and turn around and say that other people were enabling him when they pointed out that his treatment was unjust, even if his response to it was unhealthy. Hax is dead, so this narrative that banning him was what was best for him is frankly bizarre.

        Like

    2. I guess the only question that only remain is this:

      What would Armada think about all this? He spearheaded evidence.zip alongside with the other victims in the document. Would they look back and regret their decision after Hax’s death?

      It’s also noteworthy that Samox was threatened to be sued by one of the victims when he was about to post part of the evidence.zip testimony in the Melee doc.

      Like

    3. You should be more research. Hax would defending his original videos to TO’s in private the entire ban and partial unban period. This is why Hax was only partially unbanned. And then after a year of the partial unban Hax recanted his apology and restated his allegations in a video called “the truth”. This and the extent of Hax’s alcoholism and mental health crisis was only found out after the perma ban. Even this is just a summary.

       Why Hax was only partially unban and perma ban elaboration.

      Like

  3. Thank you for posting this article. What you mention from the three past articles you wrote summed up what I was thinking in the past.

    By mocking, sympathizing, nudging, or acknowledging in one form or another, we are enabling his behavior. It’s no different from bringing an alcoholic to a bar in hopes of overcoming their complex problems.

    As much as this philosophy needs to be understood, sadly the people who are weaponizing Hax’s death will continue to do so to fulfill their egos. I can argue that this article in some way is also weaponizing it, but you did it in the hopes of changing things and to warn others on not to engage in such behavior.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I initially found your blog a few months ago and read your Hax entries. They’re great informed posts that really capture the big picture. So few people online are willing to give this the nuance it needs, and frankly, deserved. If I may be so bold to share a story, I think this will be the only time I’ll ever have to.

    as far back as 2015, Al-Yami was posting publicly about how his insomnia was so bad that he was awake for 72 hours straight at tournaments

    Hax came out to a regional of mine in 2015, during one of the nights we were calling it at 3 am for matches in our friend’s apartment. A few of us stayed up, notably Hax and one of my friends who for the sake of anonymity, we’ll call “Lain”. Lain and Hax both stayed up playing until 6 am where Lain also called it. Lain recalled to me that once he awoke at 11am, Hax was at the setup still playing. He did not sleep, he did not stop, he simply joked about it and everyone thought it was endearing that here he was – in a Fox onesie playing Melee all day and all night. It was funny, and on brand for Mr. 20XX himself, Hax. Of course hindsight is 20/20, but even then I thought this was unhealthy. Without sleep, he, with the rest of us returned to the stresses of the tournament. I wondered if this was a common thing for him, or just a one off event. I never ended up asking.

    There was a brief time the court records and transcripts of Al-Yami’s questioning were put online

    After I finished his first Evidence.zip video, I spoke with Hax for the last time. I urged him to seek help, it was clear to me at least that he was in the spirals of something unimaginable. I read all 300 pages of his court deposition and one of the things that came to light was that Hax had multiple burner twitter accounts to agree and defend himself with. I truly think the last response I ever got from him, was from one of these burners, mistaking my concern for an attack not too dissimilar from how he viewed Leffen’s irateness as an assault on his existence. It was a cold farewell, and I spent the next few years tapped into the situation but never speaking. I kept my piece no longer wanting to see what had become of it. Hax did himself zero favors and by the end deserved his ban, but I never wanted him dead – which for twitter, is an idea that is too complex to even begin to swallow.

    Like

    1. Do you still have access to the 300 pages of his court deposition? I think this might be loss media.

      Can you give a summary of it if you can remember anything of note?

      Like

      1. I read your comment a few days after you made it but I really didn’t want to respond because I was hoping now that Hax was gone, the discord surrounding him would leave as well. It turns out, people are quick to wear his skin now. I’ve had some time to mull it over, so I’ll share a little of what I remember.

        The 300 page document is gone, it was taken offline while I was reading it and the only reason I could finish it was because it was cached. For clarity, it was the one where it contained his address, so it got pretty reasonable backlash for that but for what it’s worth, it must have been somewhere in the fine text because I didn’t remember seeing it anywhere in the actual transcript, which was the only part I was really interested in. It had two separate judges and one seemed to lose interest with Hax’s side. The article’s screenshot with the reddit comment is a part of the deposition from later on, with the second judge. Maybe the biggest part outside of the burners and the screenshot, was that Hax was raked over the coals by the judge asking if he had any higher education, a job, a girlfriend, life experience etc. Hax answered no to everything, indicating that Melee was his career and that with the B0xx it was enough to live on. He said he planned to play Melee and live on B0xx earnings until he was 35 at least. The Judge reprimanded him for this (earlier in the transcription he mentions Hax’s rank, he had clearly done reading on him) saying that it was impossible for someone with his placings and company to make enough to live and that it was irresponsible of him to do it, he then asked him what his plan was for after he retired as a competitor and Hax didn’t have an answer. I think the Judge was right. While I didn’t learn Hax’s address from this, his Mother, in her mania has been playing fast and loose with it and I know where they lived – if Hax had been given his entire life winnings from Melee the rent from the cheapest unit in the building would have drained it in a year. A whole lot of people like to point out that Hax had passion for the game like no other, a virtuous example of persevering through adversity – but nobody ever seems to mention that Hax had failed the first step of Adulthood but like others in his wake, couldn’t accept that for him, Melee would never pay the bills.

        I know it wasn’t a lot but that’s all that really comes to mind, and of course, I’m just one person saying something on the internet so you can take it at face value or not. Honestly I’m still uncomfortable talking about Hax because he’s used as ammunition in a never ending culture war and there was a person behind that name and I truly think he didn’t care what side he was on, as long as he got to play Melee at the end of the day.

        Like

      2. “Honestly I’m still uncomfortable talking about Hax because he’s used as ammunition in a never ending culture war” Weeper, Hax is not used as ammunition in a culture war, and this gross misinformation has to stop. People know he was treated unfairly and it cost him the most important thing in his life – competitive melee, and they genuinely can’t stand that our community treated him how they did. It has nothing to do with left vs right. I’m a left-leaning person myself in all senses of the term, and I am deeply against the systemic issues that allowed Hax to be abused by the community.

        ” A whole lot of people like to point out that Hax had passion for the game like no other, a virtuous example of persevering through adversity – but nobody ever seems to mention that Hax had failed the first step of Adulthood but like others in his wake, couldn’t accept that for him, Melee would never pay the bills.” So what? that is no justification for banning him forever and trying to control his life. If we banned people or kept people banned merely because they don’t have a backup plan or alternative means then we would an unsustainable portion of our community. People keep trying moral grandstanding “it was for his own good” and so on, but it isn’t true, doesn’t hold up to criticism. That’s why you have to strawman everybody as right-wing trolls who had the courage to call out Hax’s unfair and inhumane treatment by an unaccountable group of TOs and wannabe community leaders.

        Like

      3. Technicals literally made Hax’s death about people who were banned for hate speech. No your argument is not going to work here. Then again you can only make vague statments about Hax was wrong because the facts do not support you.

        Like

  5. Hoping this gets made into a video so it can reach more people. For people not involved in the community, Technicals completely controls the narrative due to his massive popularity and reach. Anything he says is treated as fact, and we need more voices, ones that don’t thrive on hate and targeted harassment, to give people the information they’re missing.

    Like

    1. I do get the sentiment and the need to do something, but unfortunately it will not faze him as he amassed a large following that refuses any wrongdoing and irony that should be called out. There were stories from Las Vegas that Technicals screamed at players’ ears mid-set and was apparently involved with another psychotic player who had an unhealthy obsession with him (his twitter has tons of unhinged statements that were equivalent to the evidence.zip2 video Hax made). While it’s understandable that the latter is probably why Technicals left the Smash scene, the irony is that he himself advocated for a ban when his own life was threatened but when it comes to others, he just mocks them for “karma.”

      He really got a grasp on how to win others.

      Like

      1. MeleePlayer69420 Avatar
        MeleePlayer69420

        Ok so I 100% agree technicals is a huge piece of shit and the biggest enabler in this situation by a wide margin (which lead to only the worst people vocally supporting Hax, and imo was a big part of what he relapsed and got re-banned after doing good for a year)

        but I don’t think the evidence you provided against him helps at all and maybe even hurts. The first link shows that he was an annoying piece of shit in his scene, shocker anyone could’ve told you that. Then you say he was ‘involved with a psychotic player.’ that’d be relevant and worth mentioning if he handled it anywhere near his he’s treated the Hax stuff. At the time (to my knowledge) tech wasn’t making videos about or harassing this guy, he wasn’t riling up thousands of shitty people who aren’t in the community to pile-on. JK was just a fucking insane guy and technicals happened to be there.

        like I said I agree with you and your sentiment I just think your points against him are entirely unrelated to what’s going on now and you should focus on the actual unhinged shit he’s done regarding hax

        Like

      2. Between a man trying to ram several people with his car, admitting to doing so and then blaming “muh mentals,” and whatever you think your point is, are you trying to say it’s equal to Leffen being in his feelings after spending years gatekeeping, gaslighting, and girlbossing the Smash scene?

        Can you honestly say someone taking an actual swing at your life is the same as Hax making an incoherent video (which, optics aside, made some extremely good points in hindsight) and Leffen then playing it up to high heavens for sympathy?

        “But Leffen apologized/did X.” So did Hax, and if you were to step back just for a second, you would see that from the outside looking in, Technicals is the one person coming off as genuinely caring for Hax, especially since this has been his MO for the last couple of years.

        It’s not like Cody or Ludwig is doing the community any favors, and if it wasn’t for Tech, who would shine a light on the things going on? You can disagree with his politics (whatever they are), but you need to stop being in your feelings on this one. Tech is not the disease but the symptom of a larger problem, in other words a community that normal people look at and say “wtf is going on here.”

        I have absolutely no skin in the game, I’m an absolute nobody, but I can provide the perspective of someone who’s not entirely drenched in SSBM politics. There is no reason for anyone outside the “Tech doesn’t agree with my politics, hence he is wrong” clique to disagree with anything he’s saying, because for us, politics have nothing to do with a Nintendo party game. He came with all the receipts, was prepared, and that is all that matters. If you want to gain the upper hand in controlling the discussion, that’s all you have to do, and no one is stopping the people opposing him.

        Instead, people flagged his video and removed their names from documents, making the whole situation worse.

        If he is wrong, then prove that by beating him at his own game. But since you’d rather huddle up in private groups talking about unrelated topics like thought crime, saying what he did was wrong (not that he is wrong), and then retort by pointing at six-year-old incidents or say he’s at fault for almost getting run over, do you see how people not in the “community” will take Tech’s side by default?

        You can choose to take something with you from what I wrote, or you can reply in effect by saying I shouldn’t speak on what doesn’t concern me, or something equally stupid to try to deflect from what I’m saying. But at the end of the day, no matter how much you circlejerk in your Discords or in comment sections about how you took down a video and how you’re morally superior to the evil black man, maybe put that same energy into swaying the opinion of the masses.

        Because all we see right now is people washing their obviously guilty hands, Trump Derangement Syndrome layered on top of the “IT’S MAAAM” meme, but absolutely zero accountability or will to change a community so obviously stuck up its own ass.

        Hope you get better soon, SSBM.

        Like

      3. A response to “E”‘s post.

        Hey E, Techncials himself the video was flagged by the “group chat” people he exposed that treated Hax like a lolcow. Technicals admits, and fact that the type of way video was taken down “privacy takedown” has to be manually checked by someone from youtube. Despite techncicals admiting this then also claims its a orchostraed conspiracy by the melee subreddit. The subreddit barely spoke about the controversy, yet he pretended there was organized brigading going on. Techncicals then spent several months promoting harassment of the subreddits moderated accusing them of a orginized conspiracy, he even promoted offerts to doxx the subreddits moderated. That’s the type of guy techncials is, promotes doxxing.

        If promoting doxxing not enough to be careful what techncials says, technicals lies what he talks about. He loves to snipe of qoute and have a image of the document for a few second (he never links the document), then create a argument based off the qoute, what techncials does not show you is he crops the document leaving most of it. said parts left out often directly contridict techncials argument. Technicals will claim “this person is arguing said this, or believes that” when the document says the opposite. Technicals is aware of what he is doing, he just assumes no one will challenge him because reads the documents themselves.

        So you believe he “brought recipes” yet techncials directly lies about what they say. For example, he claims Hax was banned by one action, when the original ban statements says its to do with Hax doubling down for months. Techncials claims Hax was only unbanned in one weekly, when in reality several states unbanned Hax and hax attended regionals and weekly almost everyday in several states for a entire year. Hax even attended two separate defacto majors. Technical claims Hax was rebanned due to one ban appeal video. When in reality Hax made several ban appeals before then, and only got rebanned when Hax restated his original allegations, even recanting his apology in “the truth” video. This very basic foundational facts that techncicals lies. Based on this objective lies creates a massive whole mythology.

        Techncials create a whole mythologic of vest deep shadow government conspiracy of evil TO’s, often shifting between blaming a individual TO, or blaming a random player, and then random player, and random person, and then evil boogie shadow govermen. Techncials knows what he is doing, he used Hax to push his wierd agenda.

        Remember, this is a guy who claims to be apolitcal and then spouts every single random conservative talking point.

        This guy is so disingenuous who claimed he never made a Hax video until after Hax was perma banned, when technicals has been videos from streams about Hax the entire controversy. acting like he never did anything when he promoted harassment was absolutely everyone remotely involved since day one.

        Like

  6. A player from Allston (near Allston Melee) Avatar
    A player from Allston (near Allston Melee)

    I would say well written besides the fact that all of this doesn’t matter. He’s dead now. TO’s should’ve been more transparent about his bans as well as not trying to play parole officer in his life. His life is his life. Don’t try to “help” him. He made money off of Boxx and smash. Same with Leffen. Both the same person to be fucking honest. Don’t ban either of them or ban both. Just the objective truth.

    Like

    1. All TO’s did was say he needed to make ban appeals in private. The reason Hax was only partially unbanned was because he kept telling TO’s he still stood by his original videos the entire ban and partial unban period.

      His mental health issues wasnt fully revealed untill after the perma ban because Hax recanted his apology and restated his original allegations.

      Like

  7. I appreciate the attempt at taking a thorough look at this situation. I agree wholeheartedly with putting the focuso of the conversation on Hax’s mental illness, and that people from both extreme positions should get a reality check. Those that see him as a faultless hero and those who see him as a deranged villain, both camps need to engage their compassion and take a fresh look -stop writing so much and start processing.

    However, I wouldn’t be writing a reply if I didn’t also take issue with you on some important facts. I’m not sure if its because of bias or a failure to sufficiently research, but Leffen did more to Hax and the Melee scene in terms of toxic acts than simply write some arrogant smashboards posts. Most recently he made baseless accusations of sexual assaults against Mew2king, or at least heavily platformed someone who did, which would amount to defemation. Mew2king was forced to prove himself innocent by sharing details on a medical condition that would render the alleged assault impossible for him to commit. Mew2king left the community after this ordeal.

    Also, Leffen conducted a hate campaign against Hungrybox for the crimes of being a slow and defensive Jigglypuff player. He made personal attacks on Hungrybox’s character, tried to get the ruleset changed to handicap Hungrybox and he no doubt played a part in harrassment that Hungrybox faced from the community which included abuse at tournaments by fans. Because Leffen was sane and didn’t call Hungrybox anything as crude as Hitler, the community turned a blind eye even after Hax and others brought attention to it.

    Part of why this issue is so difficult is due to the incomphrehensive disparity in fairness and response by the community towards Hax and Leffen. Leffen actually did things arguably more harmful (defemation, bullying a disabled person for being disabled when he was a teenager) than Hax, which was motivated not by mental illness or a misguided sense of justice, but for nefarious reasons (Hungrybox was a extremely difficult opponent for Leffen) and the community have dismissed all criticism of Leffen’s past behaviour because it was triggered by a mentally ill person.

    It was easiest for the community to ban Hax and ignore the objectively true things that Hax called Leffen out for, because he is mentally ill and because Leffen was a tournament favorite at the time. Now people are trying to retcon this out of our community’s history and simplify the situation to “Bipolar Gamer put too much stock into game which he deserved to be banned indefinitely from with no avenue to redeem himself and return to the thing he loves most in the world”

    Like

    1. Writing something like this completely destroys your credibility – “Most recently he made baseless accusations of sexual assaults against Mew2king, or at least heavily platformed someone who did, which would amount to defemation.”

      All he did was hear about the allegations during a Twitch stream and talk to chat saying it sounds like it could be plausible and that it’d be messed up if they were true. He wasn’t the one spreading the allegations at all. You are spreading misinformation that must’ve spread from Technicals because this completely BS talking point never existed before.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I remember Leffen publicly apologised to Mew2King for contributing to the spread of it, Mew2King made a video which is still up where he says he forgives Leffen. So pardon me for bringing it up…

        If all he did was discuss it on twitch with an open mind, then its the least serious thing he’s been involved in that he should apologize for.

        However I wouldn’t ignore everything someone has written because they were not 100% correct on one point. I suspect you are more motivated more by destroying someone’s credibility because they disagree with you, than in understanding those who have a different viewpoint to your own.

        Like

      2. I swear, almost everyone talked about in these cases is straight up lie. Guess where most of these lies come from? Yes technicals. So people Hax was banned for daring to speak about his ban, and not the literal stated reason by TO’s the Hax recanted his apology and restated his original allegations in two videos. look up “the truth” video Hax made.

        Like

    2. I’m reading through this and you’re justifying the TOs’ actions in how they banned Hax because you say he has “bipolar disorder”. You also downplay his love for Melee steering it toward him being in love with the game because he’s a superstar in that community. That’s a very normal feedback cycle; Become extraordinarily proficient at something -> people praise you -> motivates you to do better more -> get more praise. This is something was documented from literally as far back as the Roman times; and is one of the reason why it’s not shameful to call someone a “god” at something because it healthily (in general cases) incentivizes them to continue further in that in what they’re praised for. But to think this was the only reason he wanted to get back into Melee and not that he genuinely enjoyed playing for hours upon hours, is silly. He researched and started a company with the B0XX to continue playing and going through surgery for arthritis.

      Speaking of which, yes, it is scummy that he ran off with the hardware plans designed by one engineer to another till he found someone who accepted his terms. No he’s not being unreasonable in wanting a cut and his name on the product on the idea that he proposed to them with. You tout that he has no technical expertise, never had a job, and yet he still managed to start a company with a legitimate product. How did this HS graduate who has zero expertise, never held a real job, supposedly “fails at life”, manage to get labor from hardware engineers and let him go to another engineer who would then use their plans and man hours to profit off of and they got none?

      You are trying to relegate Leffen’s actions to simply Smashboards interactions with Hax to present an argument that Hax’s “obsession” with Leffen stems purely from online interactions despite the same post you made talks about them playing in person in a Money match. This implies they have interactions and a relationship in real life. You’re not giving the full story here (never mind the fact that we already know Leffen got banned in Sweden for a year for his behavior, contributed to harassment toward HungryBox and made false allegations against M2K). Erroneous foundation to build your article around.

      And on the note of admonishing him for giving up on going to a psychiatrist. Having gone to therapists myself (which honestly, I didn’t get anything out of). What exactly are these people supposed to do for a guy who’s PASSIONATE about their craft and livelihood? Help him move on? It’s passion. A life calling. You don’t give up under any circumstances. For a field I’ve finally settled in to dedicate my life to, I have told others I would shoot myself before I give up on the field. And you think some guy who overcame a literal health problem that should prevented him from playing would give up and move on because of a bunch of people telling him “no, stop playing”?

      You see a bipolar “mentally unstable” man who needs help. I see an autistic sperg who just wants to play the game! ===========================================================

      That being said, you have done NOTHING to justify the TOs’ actions against Hax which had a clear path to his death. Someone being what you deem mentally unwell DOES NOT JUSTIFY OR GIVE YOU FREE REIN TO ABUSE.

      Here’s what I want to see you address if you’re going to try and challenge the public opinion:

      • The TOs making an indefinite ban with no clear path to redemption. The use of the term “indefinite” has lead to them stringing him along where he does not know what he can do to get back in.
      • The TOs were contradictory in their reasoning for his ban
      • The TOs pressuring people with cancellation for playing with Has at a local a friend of his built with him to play Melee. This is clear social isolation. Alienating someone from a community he grew up in and discouraging all his friends from publicly supporting him WILL DRIVE A MAN MAD.

      Off the top of my head. Remember, SOMEONE IS DEAD. You think these kinds of flimsy reasons can hold up in court?

      I see folks complaining about Technicals having a heavy influence on the discussion.

      I’m sure we all saw this video where Technicals goes over the allegations. This is what you need to address.

      People keep talking so much about “mental health” while completely ignoring the social isolation that was a major factor in this story. You did it as well. Being ostracized from a community you dedicated your life to, where even people you thought of as friends wouldn’t interact with you, that is one of the most tragic, most painful feelings out there. This being ignored by many people who are defending TOs by putting the spotlight back on Hax$’s mental health, I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and believe that they are just profoundly ignorant of what social isolation can do to someone.

      If you, Tanner, were truly aware of this and still continued forth with this article. You’re malicious, nothing short of evil.

      Like

      1. Also it looks like this chained as a reply to Kipper. My apologies, that was an error. My response was directed toward the article author.

        Like

      2. A lot of what technicals states is a lie. and something he refused to admit is why Hax was perma banned.

        Hax was banned due to these two videos. In them he recants his apologies, and restates his original allegations. The mental health issues were only found out later, when TO’s revealed Hax would be telling them that he still stood by his original videos…while arguing why he should be unbanned.

        Here are the ban statements and elaborations since no one has read them apparently where they state this bluntly

        Ban from NYC Melee

        NYC elaboration

        Permanent ban

        Perma bal elaboration

        —-

        In fact Hax’s actual “we hanged for years” friends said Hax refused to have a relationship or spend time with each other outside of smash. Sorry but you can make friends outside of your profession or hobby, to say otherwise is just crazy talk.

        Like

    3. Also, Leffen conducted a hate campaign against Hungrybox for the crimes of being a slow and defensive Jigglypuff player. He made personal attacks on Hungrybox’s character, tried to get the ruleset changed to handicap Hungrybox and he no doubt played a part in harrassment that Hungrybox faced from the community which included abuse at tournaments by fans. Because Leffen was sane and didn’t call Hungrybox anything as crude as Hitler, the community turned a blind eye even after Hax and others brought attention to it.

      Yeah, you didn’t pay attention during that time period at all.

      Who do you think was the first to call Hungrybox the devil and call his playstyle 666XX? It wasn’t Leffen, it was 20XX himself, Hax.

      Did you actually read the article? If you did you may have noticed that Hax in Smashboards was the first to want a ledge grab limit for Puff.

      Leffen and Hax were both bullies. Unfortunately, Hax had bipolar disorder. That’s the only that separates their behavior.

      The other commentator is right, you know factually very little about this.

      Like

      1. “Leffen and Hax were both bullies. Unfortunately, Hax had bipolar disorder. That’s the only that separates their behavior.”

        If you consider Hax and Leffen’s behavior as equal except for Hax has a mental health disorder (which constitutes a disability), then in your mind the melee community acted prejudicially against a disabled person. How is that OK?

        Like

      2. Because it’s not the TOs job to make sure Hax handles his bipolar disorder, it’s his own. Let me remind you that NYC TOs are close friends of his since high school. They tried helping him and he didn’t want to be helped. Read darkgenex’s full account.

        Every apology he made was followed by a deletion and then DMs that he still believed Leffen was guilty. Don’t believe me? Check his posts on his public discord.

        Does it suck that people with mental disorders don’t get treated with more patience? Yes, but that’s not what happened here. If any non celebrity smash player made evidence.zip 2 they would have been permabanned instantly.

        Like

      3. Stuff like this outs you as a drama tourist. Hbox was hated by much of the community before Leffen joined it. Proclaiming it was because of Leffen Hbox was hated is major historical revisionism. Heck, Mango went out of his way to hate Hbox for a long time.

        No Hax was banned because it looked like he was about to shoot up a school. and then he kept making more videos untill he was banned after a month. Then Hax kept making more videos and more claims for months after.

        This isn’t complicated. You never watched a single Hax video have you?

        Like

  8. Read the whole article, no mention of Rocky or other people leffen PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY ABUSED who gave testimonies that are public. Just a bunch of armchair psychologist platitudes. “Beautifully crafted lie of omission”

    Like

    1. That is not relevant to this discussion…

      Like

      1. If it was not relevant, the author wouldn’t have used a very heavily euphemized version of “leffen really bad” in an actual argument he made. Saw your other post where you used poisoning the well logical fallacy against someone you disagree with. It’s kind of like how the writer of the article used the sweeten the well logical fallacy with what leffen (person he presumably “aligns” with) did in order to poison hax’s character, and lessen the good in how hax defended people leffen has wronged. No wonder you like the author of the article.

        For instance if you say “Stalin’s 5 year plans were sometimes slightly mean to people” instead of “Stalin killed and/or sent political opposition to forced labor camps”, and then use that “he wasn’t that mean, so going out of your way so much to point it out is mental illness, therefore nothing the person who critiqued him said is valid”. It’s a simultaneous application of sweetening the well logical fallacy towards aligned party, and poisoning the well towards opposition.

        Also, if darkgenyx was so close to hax “up until the end” or whatever it was he said, and the assassination of his character after he can’t defend himself since he’s dead by him is valid, how come he wasn’t even at hax’s funeral?

        Like

      2. If it was not relevant, the author wouldn’t have used a very heavily euphemized version of “leffen really bad” in an actual argument he made. Saw your other post where you used poisoning the well logical fallacy against someone you disagree with. It’s kind of like how the writer of the article used the sweeten the well logical fallacy with what leffen (person he presumably “aligns” with) did in order to poison hax’s character, and lessen the good in how hax defended people leffen has wronged. No wonder you like the author of the article.

        For instance if you say “Stalin’s 5 year plans were sometimes slightly mean to people” instead of “Stalin assassinated and/or sent political opposition to forced labor camps”, and then use that “he wasn’t that mean, so going out of your way so much to point it out is mental illness, therefore nothing the person who critiqued him said is valid”. It’s a simultaneous application of sweetening the well logical fallacy towards aligned party, and poisoning the well towards opposition.

        Also, if darkgenyx was so close to hax “up until the end” or whatever it was he said, and the assassination of his character after he can’t defend himself since he’s dead by him is valid, how come he wasn’t even at hax’s funeral?

        Like

      3. Hey Nico. Hax himself said Darkgenex was doing the right thing in that post, and said it was truthful. Claiming it was a character assassination is lie according to Hax. I doubt you read it yourself. Oh by the way that document was released like year before Hax’s passing. So even basic facts cant be stated here?

        Darkgenex was also threatened by Hax’s mom to never speak to Hax again threatening a lawsuit.

        Like

    2. you know whataboutism is arguing Hax deserved the ban right?

      Like

  9. A longtime observer Avatar
    A longtime observer

    As someone who witnessed all of this – the disputes with engineers, the lawsuits, the shoring up of support for flame wars, the videos about leffen, the donation drive for summit, all of this is true. Don’t let people who’s only ever watched technicals videos and never went to tournaments tell you differently. The fact is that he was just as manipulative as he claimed Leffen to be.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Hax did develop the b0xx though and this article again tries to severely downplay this part which misses out on the most crucial and important part of what Hax contributed to the b0xx not the name, not the idea, not the marketing or website but the actual button layout. That layout is a thousand percent completely designed by Hax I know this because I spoke to him about this in great lengths.

    This is precisely what matters and what everyone copied from Hax$ and tried to take credit away from him on and he felt it was an attack on him, which it was. People on Reddit and other social media made it seem that Hax did nothing to develop the b0xx and that even the thing he uniquely made by himself was not his. This is simply not true.

    Hax does not claim that he built b0xxes or produces them and even the lawyer seems unaware of the difference between developing a product and producing them because these are two different things. The questioning of the lawyer in that screenshot is as plain as night and the day and lines up with what Hax is saying, he didn’t produce the b0xx controllers that is not his job. But neither did Stephen either, what Hax did was develop the majority of the controller and provide marketing, documentation, balance updates and a general producer and owner of the brand and controller.

    In short I find this article to have a level of bias that makes me question the writers intentions on this matter because it seems to contain the same bias that is sweeping throughout and trying to chalk up very obviously malicious intentions to Hax having mental health issues. I believe the mental health issues if they occurred to any degree occurred because of the malicious intentions and not the other way around.

    Like

    1. You can summarize the Alyssa White video in 7 words: Aziz didn’t respect her or her opinion.

      So he decided to take his business elsewhere. I would do the same thing if my cofounder didn’t respond to my messages. Doesn’t matter if they were sent at midnight and 2am. If we are starting a company together, we need to be aligned. If you prioritize your health over the company and I prioritize the opposite, then we are simply incompatible.

      The main criticism I see towards Aziz is he was a shrewd businessman. Last time I checked that is the exact quality you need in the founder of a company that sells consumer electronics.

      And to WatchingGuy (the guy who claimed he came up with the “b0xx” name). Did you copyright it? No? Sorry bud. You’re outta luck.

      Like

      1. Do you honestly believe Hax$ was “starting a company” with Hitbox? How is that possible?

        Like

      2. I do not believe Hax$ was “starting a company” with Hitbox.

        Like

      3. >cofounder

        I hope your business never gives a free product to broken ex-player as a favor and then have that player hijack your gofundme and then try to create a competitor while lying about your product.

        Hax should have been sued several times. And when he finally did, he lost. Shrewd businessman indeed.

        Like

    2. Hitbox claims Hax lied about the layout, in fact they say Hax lied about most of what happened. Hax made insane hyperbolic claims semilar to what he did with Leffen, arguing they were orchestrating conspiracies. Basically everything about that event is desputed.

      And no can deny that after two weeks Hax proclaiming he should own a quarter of the products sales, to brand it all around himself, and then when told no tried to slander Hitboxes kickstarter right at its last week to promote his own competing product, ins’t sketch as heck.

      Like

  11. I don’t disagree with much of what you’re writing, but to me it seems like a lot of the “content” (I’d prefer the word discourse) is not about some great agenda or finding someone to blame. I’m sure there are some, maybe even plenty of people who use his death to continue their dumb crusade against Leffen or TOs or Technicals or whoever, but to me it seems like most people are just angry that a young man died and they want to know why and what could have been done differently. This is a pretty natural impulse and while some of this takes irrational form (not everything has a clear cut cause, someone nice and easy to blame), I also personally find it hard to look back at the events that lead to his death and NOT think that so much awful things could have been avoided if just a handful of people acted a little bit differently – this includes Hax obviously. I think it’s extremely unfair to blame anyone but Hax for his own actions or his death, but at the same time I think it’s reductive to say he was just mentally unwell/BPD and nothing anyone else did contributed to the way his life unravelled.

    You go to great lengths to say that Hax was obsessed with being Hax, with playing Melee, with his identity as a “star” in the scene and how this was unhealthy, how anyone not trying to put a stop to that is an enabler. I find that…. a bit weird. It’s not like he randomly won this identity, he worked hard for it, it came with benefits, it seems perfectly natural to be attached to it. It seems natural to lash out when confronted with losing it. Is a person more than their Smash handle? Obviously yes, but it’s a fact that Hax spent so much time and effort inside this handle, much of his life has culminated in it. It feels disingenious to just pretend this was some crazy obsession and not a somewhat reasonable assement of what Hax had to show for himself in terms of career/life achievements, given how much of his friends, connections and money was related/dependant on Smash. And I don’t think “enabling” this obsession should be equated to enabling all his worst impulses, the paranoia, drinking, etc.

    My ultimate point being, going back to the first paragraph, I think there should be some sort of response in the scene on how this was handled. TOs strung Hax along with increasingly arcane demands that went way above and beyond what any of them had any right or qualification to demand. And the big question I can’t help but ask myself is – for what? What was the great evil that this ban was supposed to prevent? You had a guy clearly struggling, openly begging for help, for mercy, and he was denied – for what? What was the upside? Are we supposed to pretend everyone thought he was a danger to others at tournaments? Did we need to set an example?

    To clarify, I do not think an unban would have “cured” Hax. Obviously, his problems ran much better. They were not caused or solved by a ban or unban. But I can’t help thinking these problems would have been easier to work on, easier to contain, easier to control if he didn’t feel alienated from the one community he ever cared about, hamstrung in his ability to make money. Given that, again, I ask what was gained by refusing to throw this guy a bone. And to be clear, I’m not pretending that the very fact that he even had the potential to be unbanned wasn’t already some sort of favour or recognition of his past in the scene – it’s hard to imagine some random 0-2 player getting anything but a permaban with no way of redemption after publishing the things Hax did.

    This is getting too long, but I dunno, I just feel so sad over such an unnecessary death (aren’t they all?) and maybe my desire for people to “reflect on their actions” is my irrational response to that. But to say “oh well BPD, such tragedy, nothing anyone did mattered at all, moving on” doesn’t feel right at all.

    Like

    1. This seems like a super reasonable comment – I’m a TO and am open to talking 1:1 in dms or discord somewhere if you wanna ask questions and get a deeper perspective. Let me know your discord username and I’ll try to find you. I think this blog post is focused, intentionally avoiding talking about stuff that might require research/interviews with TOs, friends, etc, sticking to public accounts/publicly available information. That’s a good thing, in my view, but I also think people who are acting in good-faith as melee community members/attendees deserve the time of people who watched this all unfold, if they ask for it.

      Like

      1. Aren’t you the guy who dragged the Smash Factor TOs (Mexico’s biggest tournament) for letting Hax attend without asking permission from the NA TOs? And accused them of engagement baiting and stoking culture-war and drew comparisons with letting someone attend who was guilty of soliciting minors?

        Like

      2. I criticized The Smash Factor TOs on two grounds: first, I don’t believe we should unban players based on facebook polls. You may disagree with this position, but I think it’s a pretty reasonable one to hold.

        Second, I believe anyone banning a player from out-of-region should speak with that region’s TOs. If the Smash Factor TOs banned a player, and I was unsatisfied with the public reasoning behind it, I would absolutely want to make an effort to connect with them to discuss that player if they signed up for my event. I see that as basic due dilligence. You may disagree, again, but it’s not an unreasonable position.

        If they come to a different decision, I might disagree with it, but I’d respect that they put in the effort to learn more.

        The context many people missed, including technicals, was that the *consequences* of my position – the thing I actually did as a result of my disagreement, was 1) tweeting that i didn’t like the decision, and 2) I didn’t have a topic about smash factor on my comedy game show the week before

        I never called for a boycott of the event, and never called for any public shaming towards their TOs. And in fact, we ended up talking about smash factor anyways the week after because I really value tournaments that take place in real cities where people can enjoy walking around, great food, etc etc. My ‘platform’ and reach is far smaller than the people who came in to criticize me. My show gets no more than 3k viewers on average. Technicals’ videos get 100000s of views. So if he says I’m the bad guy, there’s not much I can do to reach his audience and change their minds. It is what it is.

        In a thread arguing with someone who disagreed with my position, I asked if they would support a Tournament unbanning someone based on a facebook poll if they were transphobic or had committed some kind of sexual crime. The intent of that question was to gauge whether they supported Facebook Polls for unbans in *all* situations, or just in Hax’s. Sometimes when I am disagreeing with someone, I pose hypotheticals, with the intent to figure out if they support a concept as a rule in all cases, or only some. This makes it easier to see if we disagree on something fundamental, or something marginal.

        Technicals took that out of context and ran with it as ‘jack is comparing what hax did to transphobia/sexual assault’. I think that’s an unfair framing, but he’s entitled to his opinion. I can be a condescending debatelord, it’s true, but asking hypotheticals to evaluate what a person believes is not the same thing as saying A=B. I do not think what Hax did was as bad as what Zero did, for example.

        If you wanna chat more with me on this, let me know and ill find a way for us to discuss privately. Overall I enjoyed Smash Factor a lot and wish for success for the Mexican scene. I don’t think they owe the ‘NA TOs’ any kind of fealty, but I think collaborating on sharing information about banned players is standard practice and helps people make good decisions.

        Hope this helps!

        Like

      3. I appreciate you taking the time.

        Unbanning based on facebook polls universally is one thing, but in the specific case of allowing Hax to enter a tournament based on the results of a facebook poll, it’s different. Perhaps the SF TOs knew plenty about Hax’s situation but wanted to run it by their community rather than let him enter without checking first, it seems perfectly reasonable to me. Perhaps a community vote by the NA and EU TOs over Hax’s ban would have been a sensible idea too, in terms of dealing with the division that resulted.

        I understand it was a hypothetical posed for you to understand somebody’s position better, or perhaps as a persuasive device, but after everything Hax and the community has been through, it’s poor taste to draw comparisons between him and somebody soliciting a minor, and a false equivalence to boot.

        I know you didn’t go so far as to campaign for a boycott of the event. However, Danny who writes for “When’s Melee?” admitted to refusing to publish that the tournament was even happening and thus depriving them of potential viewers, all because of the TOs decision to allow Hax’s attendance. It’s just an example of the underhanded ways that people within the community who were against Hax’s rehabilitation into the community conducted themselves. Forgive me for suspecting you were more interested in persuading the TOs of Smash Factor than you were innocently providing supplementary information that may have been concealed from the community at large.

        I’m getting emotional, so I won’t write more, and I can see that you’ve twice offered in this blog’s replies to speak privately. I’m suspicious of your intentions but I would urge you if you do speak to anyone that you make sure to listen charitability, not everybody who thinks Hax deserved better is an angry right-wing goon.

        Like

      4. Sure, add me on discord ‘Jackzilla’ if you’d like to speak more. I’ll reply to a few thoughts here, still though, and the comment may be pretty long!

        The WHOLE thing with smash factor/me and danny started because I thought it was unfair that Danny, who writes a blog that averages maybe 100 views, got a ton of attention for choosing to leave out Smash Factor, but I got no attention for choosing to leave out smash factor on my ‘current events’ comedy show. I said hey, my friend is getting shit on for this thing i technically did too!! and then look at that, I got shit on as well (I guess I did ask for it!)

        I still do not consider either omission to be something that denied SF any potential viewers, or reflected underhanded conduct. We’re just two guys and are more driven by what we find fun than anything else. For Danny, he has a relatively consistent policy of not talking about melee events featuring widely banned players (ie, manalord events).

        “Perhaps the SF TOs knew plenty about Hax’s situation but wanted to run it by their community rather than let him enter without checking first, it seems perfectly reasonable to me.”

        It’s possible – but they were invited to chat w/ the NYC TOs and, at least according to them at the time, didn’t take them up on it. I could absolutely be wrong, but my impression at the time based on talking to the relevant parties was that they chose-either because they were busy or disinterested- not to connect w/ the local team. Maybe they felt like they couldn’t be trusted? I’m not sure.

        “I understand it was a hypothetical posed for you to understand somebody’s position better, or perhaps as a persuasive device, but after everything Hax and the community has been through, it’s poor taste to draw comparisons between him and somebody soliciting a minor, and a false equivalence to boot.”

        Yeah I hear you but my core argument is still: I was not equivocating crimes, I was evaluating unban methodologies. If the person I was talking to said ‘Of course I wouldn’t support an unban of a sexual assaulter or transphobe based on a facebook poll!’ I’d have replied something like ‘Great – so we agree there is a line where we don’t let the public decide, I just have my line at a different place than you do.’ For what it’s worth, nobody seemed to notice the ‘transphobia’ part of my argument. I’m not sure why that is – maybe there’s an incentive to focus on the ‘most outrageous interpretation’ possible?

        “I’m suspicious of your intentions but I would urge you if you do speak to anyone that you make sure to listen charitability, not everybody who thinks Hax deserved better is an angry right-wing goon.”

        I know it’s the kind of thing that someone could take out of context or never believe me when I say it, but I think my intentions are to connect with people who want to go to melee events, or have gone, or who just want to have a real human conversation: not a public ‘DEBATE’ based on video essays and tribal lines.

        I didn’t know hax all that well. Most of my involvement in his ban was facilitation, and when it became clear to me he was threatening self-harm, i felt it was important for TOs to immediately connect w/ mental health professionals at least on an individual basis. there’s only so much i can do as some random guy in california with a tournament in indiana, to talk about or to a guy in new york. I wasn’t his friend or his support network.

        All of this to say: I agree that Hax deserved better. You and I might disagree on whether that means something like ‘the indefinite ban was unfair’, or ‘he deserved to be unbanned sooner’, or ‘he deserved better treatment and support networks for his mental health’, but I’ve never met someone going through a mental health crisis who didn’t deserve better than what our society and the humans in it can muster.

        My primary resource as an individual (and one who I connected several TOs to) was a Tournament Organizer and licensed psychologist. I called him a few times as the situation escalated to sort my own thoughts. My role wasn’t huge, but I felt, for instance, like people who were hearing hax say things like ‘if i dont get unbanned i am going to kill myself’ needed to talk to professionals. I believe most if not all of them did, though I can’t speak to their experiences, only mine. I have no idea what I’d do if someone said that to me. I have no idea what the right thing to do is – do I enable the person? Do I make false promises, or just concede? Do I try to stand firm? It feels like almost any choice could be a false one, which is why getting advice from someone who trains for those scenarios was important, at least to me. But again, I was lucky enough that I wasn’t getting those calls or messages.

        I have lost friends to suicide, and it makes me very emotional too. The family of one friend who died didn’t allow anyone at the funeral to mention that he had killed himself. That denial still makes me mad to this day – it makes me sad I wasn’t more there for my old friend, and frustrated that his family may not have been there for him, either. We need the people closest to us when we lose connection with our own reality, or imagine that our life isn’t worth living.

        I think a lot of people have stories like this. Suicide turns people against each other. We want to say never again. We want to say what could we have done differently. We imagine it almost like a video game where we could pick the ‘right moves’ – and in many of the hax-unban-supporters views the ‘right move’ was obvious (unban hax). I do not see it that way – I think threatening self-harm does not merit an unban (other things equal). It does merit serious attention and trying to connect the person – to the extent you can while not really knowing them – to mental health resources.

        ‘Finding a person/persons’ to blame is incredibly common after a suicide (or complications from one, in this case). The mental health professionals i’ve talked to have been pretty clear that that way of thinking can be deeply misleading, or counter-productive. There is a middle ground where TOs can evaluate and make more transparent our options when someone is going through a mental health crisis, and talk about what ban processes can/cant achieve. But I draw the line at ‘blame for death’. I know it’s convenient for me to draw the line there, and I will be lambasted by some as cowardice, but it’s what I believe, and I think whenever I’ve had a real conversation with people about it, they come to understand why I believe that, and usually find ways to connect it to their own life and experiences too.

        This has become a blog post of it’s own, and I’m sorry to say I felt self-conscious writing it knowing that it could be screenshotted and put in a youtube video, maybe there are flaws in my arguments, or gaps in my experiences, or whatever else, that will be inflated and turned into a reason for people to hate me, or try to punish me. That’s something I really resent right now and why I like to take conversations one at a time, out of the public eye when possible. It means we can be more human with each other.

        Like

      5. why does it have to be 1v1 in dms? If you wanna be transparent just answer the questions, don’t try to hide the discussion or isolate people from the discourse.

        the whole “dm me” is such a dead give away of someone who have something to hide these days and being your level of online you should know this. Isolating people in dms so you can use whatever grey area discussion tactics you’re gunning for is so slimy and if those dms where to be leaked it’s easy for you to turn around and shift it from the topic at hand to “he leaked the dms”.

        keep the conversation public because this whole “wanna talk on discord” is just snake behavior 101 no matter who does it but especially if you try to frame it as “see, im so open with stuff I’ll even talk things out in ptovate”.

        Like

    2. Someone lied to you. Hax was not given arcane reasoning to be unbanned. He was told he is suppose to appeal to be unbanned in private, like what everyone else does. Yet after a year where Hax attended several majors and unbanned by many regions, he made two videos restating his original allegations and recanting his apology, look up “the truth” video Hax made.

      Hax was not banned by the entire smash community because it reveal after he was perma banned Hax would be defending his original videos to TO’s while arguing why he should be unbanned, the entire ban and partial unban period. This is the stated reason why he was only partially unbanned.

      Hax has talked about his alcoholism, and health issues before any of these controversies even started.

      Like

  12. Really well written. I see many comments try and cite things leffen did as a disparity in treatment of the players or a legit justification of Hax’s behavior but as another commenter said: its entirely irrelevant to the discussion, and I think that your framing makes this clear. Nobody thinks leffen is a nice guy, but, to any reasonable observer, Hax’s campaign against him was that of someone who had a worrying fixation. Symptoms of something deeper which has been touched upon well here, and something that I think qualifies as harassment by any reasonable standard. Knowing the history of this behavior I find strengthens this belief and I have so much sympathy for the people in the NY scene who had to make these decisions, with this context, believing it was the right thing to do for their community, and their friend. At every step it was clear to me that people were legitimately trying to help Hax both get treatment, and get back to what he loved.

    When a player is unrelenting in their harassment of another player, they should not be allowed to play at tournaments. Leffen’s actions may warrant a ban (as they have in the past), and bringing them to light publically was never the problem. It was the obssession, the campaign, and the dishonesty. There is no shortage of evidence that these were symptoms of deeper issues, and to enable those things is not only hurtful to the people who suffer, but to those around them. Nobody is at fault for this. To get help, you need to be aware of a problem. It feels callous to write this but it makes me more sad than anything that a player I grew up watching left a legacy like this. RIP Hax$, in time I hope we only need to think about the good.

    Like

    1. I think this is definitely hitting the nail on the head. Hax undeniably had his issues, and a lot of people unknowingly enabled them because they were kinda blindsided by the fact that Leffen is undeniably an asshole. Generally when you see someone going through psychosis on the internet targeting another figure, it’ll be something like a 36 year old man claiming George Clooney is a cannibal stalking him in the park, so it’s harder to spot the warning signs when they’re being backed up by a premise that actually is fundamentally true, or at least widely agreed upon (that being Leffen has repeatedly acted terribly towards other players).

      So much of the coverage from the FreeHax corner of his life prior to and after his death has consisted of regurgitating that ‘he was banned because he compared another player to Hitler’. And then focusing on the general anti-Leffen talking points, which as you said are completely irrelevant. The symptoms managed to slip by, and Hax only found further encouragement when everyone around him kept writing off everything from his extreme desperation to return to tournaments, the Leffen fixation, his actual habits as a tournament attendee (staying up for 72 hours due to insomnia being a big example), as all just being eccentricities. I would even go as far as to argue that the physical health issues he developed as a result of the way he played were also sort of rooted in a kind of dangerous obsession. I certainly agree that people will go to borderline insane lengths for their passions, but you do have to take a step back and think about whether it’s safe when the person in question is diagnosed with a pretty severe mental illness.

      Overall, it’s just sad from all angles. I agree that it’s depressing that Hax$’s legacy is basically going to boil down to the horror story of a fighting game community attempting to deal with one of its best players having a mental health crisis. RIP, he deserved a lot better.

      Like

      1. I like this post, and this is as somebody who thought Hax should have been unbanned long before he mentioned suicide or went through with an attempt.

        What we need is for people who felt his ban was justified and those who felt his ban was unjustified to see eye to eye and stop being blinded by preconceived notions about the other. I can understand the argument that tournament participating was actually harmful to him due to the sleep issues as you say, but this patriarchal “we know what’s best for you” just might not work, and its something that people and those responsible for their care need to figure out together, rather than be sheltered from against their will and all the negativity that comes from that.

        I don’t see any truly convincing arguments why he should still have been banned except for it the best thing for him (an opinion) or the community (thats a can of worms), which are not the reasons actually given for his ban, which were around the risks he posed to others, etc, which become a lot more dubious as to their validity.

        However, let’s not argue about whether the ban was justified, or the best thing for him or his community. I want people to stop tarring anyone who felt the ban wasn’t right as right-wing trolls, and I want those who resent the TOs, and wider community who who memed on Hax, to understand that people are generally doing what they think is best.

        Like

      2. The crazy thing is the misinformation about Hax was so wide spread that even basic facts are disputed. Hax was perma banned because he made a ban appeal video and then followup video called “the truth” were he recants his apology and restated his original allegations.

        This is even stated why Hax was banned, but they argue it was because he talked about his not, not Hax recanting his apology and doing the exact same thing that got him banned in the first place. the Ban statements and followup statements were pretty clear on this.

        Like

    2. And the fact Hax recanted his apology and restated his original allegations in a video called “the truth” after a year where he was actively being unbanned, even actively competing and attending several majors.

      Like

  13. Thank you so, so much for writing this. I’m so glad someone took the time to do it.

    I don’t wanna write my whole life story here, but thank you for humanizing him. I’m honestly going through a rough patch in my life, and I can’t help but see myself in Hax. I was never as good as him at Smash, but even today close to my 30th birthday, I feel like competing and “being good” at Smash is and was such a crucial part of myself that I still struggle to visualize a life without it, and it’s been quite a burden for the past few years.

    Can’t describe how devastating the last 2 weeks has been, even though I never even talked to Hax once. People using his death as a mean to promote themselves and their worldview, even at his own funeral (and getting praised for it), is probably the most heinous shit I’ve ever seen. Makes me wanna vomit.

    Hax was my main inspiration back then and It’s been really sad watching all of this unfold. I just wish we could let him rest and stop this crowd from ruining his legacy, I can’t even look at his shine pfp without associating it with bigots.

    RIP

    Like

  14. So he was never disruptive to a tournament, never physically violent, nor ever physically threatening. It’s clear he was mildly unwell and obsessive about melee, but we don’t think the ban was justified or ‘good for his well being’ like the to’s claim.

    Like

      1. Yes. Destroying a man’s reputation, ostracizing him from his passion and purpose in life and enjoining him from discussing the severely traumatic event publicly could take anyone from ‘mildly’ to ‘suicidal.’

        Like

      2. I’m not sure what your point here is. Mildly unwell or not it comes down to whether he deserved to be banned for the length of the time that he was or not, and although you say you’re not out to denigrate his name, this really does feel like a sort of hit piece, justifying his maltreatment on the grounds that he was “mentally unwell” enough to deserve it.

        Like

    1. Hax was banned due to these two videos. In them he recants his apologies, and restates his original allegations. The mental health issues were only found out later, when TO’s revealed Hax would be telling them that he still stood by his original videos…while arguing why he should be unbanned.

      Here are the ban statemenst and elaboratiosn since no one has read them apparently where they state this bluntly

       Ban from NYC Melee

      NYC elaboration

      Permanent ban

      Perma bal elaboration

      Like

      1. To be clear TO’s have never made the argument that Hax not playing is ‘good for his well being’. TO’s never said this. So either you knowingly lied or someone lied to you.

        Like

  15. Just the facts Avatar

    How did the dude actually die?

    Like

    1. No one knows. At best it was “it was due to a severe medical emergency and long-term health complications that led to his hospitalization.” from what people involved said to a journalist.

      Hax has complained about health issues for years, even before all of this started. He stated he a self admit alcoholic and possibly suffered other addiction too. In addition to his untreated mental disorders and vague stated other chronic health issues. Really its pure speculation beyond these facts.

      https://meleestats.co/monday-morning-marth-march-31/

      Like

  16. I agree with this largely, but I don’t like how people (generally new to the scene) tend to either downplay or misrepresent what leffen did to get banned in the early 2010s. The main victim of his bullying regularly asks to not be brought up by name (likely due to fear of additional retaliation), but leffen bullied a disabled kid to the point where they had to leave the scene entirely and don’t want anyone from melee to ever contact them again. All the information is in the original evidence.zip folder if you’d like to read it. I think you were trying to limit it to Hax’s personal relationship with leffen, but i do think that is pretty important context to have when discussing why someone who was in the community at the time might seem overly upset with leffen for his other more minor offenses.

    Like

    1. 0 mention of gregturbo and willp and mikey the cheat doxxing him. Ultimately hax decided to jump in front of the train that was his decision. We just want the community to except some responsibility instead of ” they fed into his delusions”. Not even true, if you go back and read comments when he posted them freehax people would tell him to stop making videos even public enemy number 1 tech told him his videos were nonsense.

      Like

      1. Jackzilla’s Smash Factor tweets is really bad… He wanted every single TO to ban Hax without exception, even in Mexico, and compared him to a child abuser.

        The thing is that the majority of the community still silences and strawmans freehax people and has learned absolutely nothing from this.

        The viewership and attendance of tournaments has suffered massively the last few years and it’s not all due to Nintendo back in 2022. I can’t be alone as a melee community member who fell out of love with the game and community after seeing how Hax was treated.

        Like

    2. It’s notable leaving out the part where Leffen was a teenager, and that it happened a decade ago….or the fact he was banned for it.

      Talking leffen when talking Hax shows hwo little the freehax drama tourists actually cared about Hax as a person. Just some vague of a person instead of someone dealing with mental and addictions.

      Like

      1. Or mentioning said document was doxxed containing people full legal names and without the permission of anyone involved.

        Like

  17. People like Leffen are the reason that Nintendo hates the competitive smash community. Downright vile person. Hax may have been a jerk at times, but he had everything taken from him. He had a company and patent stolen from him. He watched his bully achieve fame. He died in agony and people are patting Leffen on the back for it.

    Like

    1. are there any screenshot of what jackzilla tweeted?

      Like

      1. thefranChise on youtube showed them in a video

        youtube.com/watch?v=oJqp4yzrXvY 1:30 for some tweets and another at 2:08

        Liked by 1 person

    2. You are such a drama tourist you have no idea Leffen left the community like 5 years ago now. He not really a part of it. Yet here you are still talking about him.

      By the way, it was proven in court Hax’s company and patent was not stolen from him. That’s pure fanfiction

      Like

      1. you are the guy @AL-lh2ht who has been commenting on every single tribute video to Hax. Your hate on Hax is at obsessed level man.

        Like

      2. Accusing me of being random people is not the credibility boost you think it is. The deep state strikes again!

        Like

  18. Your reporting on the engineers and consultants motivated me to comment. I also worked on the b0xx alongside others, including Arhum. I contributed significantly to the interface and programming, working nearly full-time after my regular job for about two months. Another engineering student named Jimmy was also involved around that time if my memory serves correctly. I mined data from a modded Melee ROM debug console and advised on tilt-modifier values (run/walk, tilt attacks, shield). I developed improved SOCD handling, the lightshield modifier, and contributed to button mapping decisions, including placing L-shield on the left pinky.

    When the project transitioned into a business, unfortunately, interpersonal challenges arose, were Aziz suddenly felt like I contributed nothing, which was not reality-based in the slightest. Shortly after, he blocked me on Discord. Despite never receiving compensation for my contributions, I’m genuinely glad to see many players continue to use the controller I dedicated so much passion and effort to—it has always been an honor to serve this community.

    Aziz was deeply passionate and driven by excellence, traits that resonated strongly with me. Sadly, I witnessed firsthand his struggles with mental health, even before the difficulties surrounding more firm decisions on controller legality and his eventual bans from local tournaments and events. It became clear to those of us close to him at the time that he was fighting severe personal battles.

    Had circumstances allowed us to continue collaborating, I believe the controller would have seen even greater advancements. I was already prototyping designs such as hall-effect sensor-based switches, potentially easier to make tournament-legal compared to a purely digital controller. Now, with advancements from companies like Wooting and Razer in optical and analog actuation, these developments would be even simpler and more accessible. However, my motivation diminished significantly after our conflict, as I did not wish to engage further amidst growing misunderstandings and misinformation.

    A lot of time has passed, and reflecting on these events, I want to sincerely pay my respects.

    Rest in peace, Aziz. Your relentless pursuit of perfection, trusting your gut, and your exceptional determination are qualities I deeply admire and hope to foster in myself as I face my own challenges.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. “The details are murky, but it seems to stem from complications related to a prior suicide attempt last year. I won’t eulogize the man; I didn’t know him”

    Well, it’s nice of you to admit that you’re as capable to write about Hax as you are capable to write about physical fitness or dieting.

    Like

  20. Y’all people commentating are a bunch of snowflakes. Hax$ had mental issues and his crudely obsession of Melee was his downfall when he was banned. As stated in said article he felt like a nobody. To put the blame on leffen is dumb. Is leffen innocent? No but neither are all the other people who commented on Hax$s post either. At the end of the day..its a damn video game. Who gives a crap on whose banned or not.

    Like

    1. These people cant even admit hax was perma banned due to him recanting his apology and restating his allegations.

      Like

      1. I’m not blaming Leffen for Hax’s death, and it’s a strawman to assert that everybody is doing that.

        In my emails today I have 15 or so messages to this blog by yourself, yet you call other people a drama tourist you are in this blog arguing feverishly with anybody who believes the melee community was wrong in how it treated Hax.

        All your posts usually com back to this, which I assume you believe is some sort of silver-bullet that exposes people who feel Hax was treated unfairly: “These people cant even admit hax was perma banned due to him recanting his apology and restating his allegations.”

        He didn’t recant his apology, and it shows how bad-faith and intellectually dishonest you are being here. I guess you are mostly seeking to inflame the subject because your life is boring and mundane.

        Hax didn’t recant his apology. But Hax did say that he believes most of what he said about Leffen, but he never recanted his apology with regards to some of the things he said, and how forceful his language was.

        If you accept that the only reason Hax was banned for years until his death is that he restating his allegations, it exposes the double-standard. Leffen went after Hungrybox HARD, thumbnails with Hbox as the devil hard. Leffen also went after Hax’s Boxx too, and promoted Frame1 and in his review and box comparison videos would do his darndest to belittle and smear Haxx’s box. As to Hbox Leffen did everything in his might to contribute to Hbox’s image problems and wanted as close to a ban as possible as he could achieve on Puff.

        The only difference between what Hax was banned for in this case and what Leffen did is that Leffen was smarter about it (not surprising since he does not have substance abuse and bipolar) and yet after Hax’s allegations woke people up as to how deplorable Leffens behavior was, it didnt make sense that Hax was banned for things that Leffen himself did.

        The problem is that it takes a little thought to see because Leffen was very intelligent in how he went after Hbox and Hax. However, whether it’s just to actually ban someone for making allegations when these allegations are not demonstrably false and are oftentimes inconclusively true, is the issue.

        Leffen should have been banned all this time ago and he was definitely a factor in banning and keeping Hax banned because he claimed to fear for his safety due to Hax’s worst supporters. Leffen has more viewership pull than Hax and so tournament organisers had legal incentive to keep Hax away.

        It’s just sad that after Leffen left melee that we still can’t accept that Hax was at least somewhat right about what he said and that because of this Hax shouldn’t have still been banned for believing what he believed.

        Like

    2. You need to watch the video “the truth” by Hax. Hax literally stated he lied about his apology, then he deletes all his videos and statements that included his apology. You can’t deny this fact. This isn’t remotely disputed. Hax restated his original allegations, arguing he only worded it wrong.

      Oh man you have no idea Hax was partially unbanned by much of the scene, even attended several majors. He decided to admit he lied after a year of activily being unbanned.

      Arguing whataboutism is literally agreeing you think Hax deserved the ban. But then again you have no idea what Hax’s actual allegations even are. Hax didnt call Leffen a dodo head my guy. He declared Leffen was orchestrating several massive conspiracies and controlled the smash scene in evil plots. No these were not proven correct. You can’t even state what Hax said.

      Man you don’t even know Hungrybox was hated by the scene even before Leffen joined it. Declaring the entire scenes feeling on Hbox is do to leffen is insane. But cool outing yourself as a tourist when you dont know this fact.

      “Leffen has more viewership pull than Hax and so tournament organisers had legal incentive to keep Hax away.” Pure nonsense. There is no money in the scene, why TO’s care about this for when he barely attended anything for years. This is a dumb conspiracy showing your own delusions.

      But keep going with your vague nonsense. I bet you won’t even bother to watch a single of Hax’s videos. Not even “the truth”.

      Like

  21. I will just add that I would actually disagree with banning people for what Hax did (except for the first few videos which were deranged and unreasonable compared to his future videos) If people can’t call each other out for things then it hinders our ability to protect ourselves and our community.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Be honest. You haven’t watched a single Hax video have you? This magic reasonable Hax video does not exist. The can’t name it or link it because it’s not real.

      Like

    2. You need to watch the video “the truth” by Hax. Hax literally stated he lied about his apology, then he deletes all his videos and statements that included his apology. You can’t deny this fact. This isn’t remotely disputed. Hax restated his original allegations, arguing he only worded it wrong.

      Oh man you have no idea Hax was partially unbanned by much of the scene, even attended several majors. He decided to admit he lied after a year of activily being unbanned.

      Arguing whataboutism is literally agreeing you think Hax deserved the ban. But then again you have no idea what Hax’s actual allegations even are. Hax didnt call Leffen a dodo head my guy. He declared Leffen was orchestrating several massive conspiracies and controlled the smash scene in evil plots. No these were not proven correct. You can’t even state what Hax said.

      Man you don’t even know Hungrybox was hated by the scene even before Leffen joined it. Declaring the entire scenes feeling on Hbox is do to leffen is insane. But cool outing yourself as a tourist when you dont know this fact.

      “Leffen has more viewership pull than Hax and so tournament organisers had legal incentive to keep Hax away.” Pure nonsense. This is a dumb incoherent conspiracy showing your own delusions. Vague statement of “legal incentive” nonsense.

      But keep going with your vague nonsense. I bet you won’t even bother to watch a single of Hax’s videos. Not even “the truth”

      Like

      1. His allegations are correct, “The Truth” is showing that his accusations were made in good-faith and were not defamatory.You can argue he recanted his apology to Leffen but he did not recant his apology and remorse over his behavior in general. The way that you are trying to using that video of Hax as dishonest is sickening, when it is a video in which is being honest. From “The Truth” “I intervened at the right time, but in the wrong way” – this sums up what I am saying. It shows he is still understanding of how his behavior was wrong but that he was right to expose Leffen.

        I am not arguing whataboutism, I can see why you think that, but I’m actually demonstrating the dishonesty as to the reasoning for Hax’s ban. Hax did not defame Leffen as he did not lie, and his going after Leffen was not malicious or constitute harrasment. The fact that Leffen did not face any consequences for his going after Hungrybox personally with multiple videos in a similar way to Hax did (minus the mental illness) proves that Hax was not banned for those reasons but for political ones.

        I will restate here what I said in other comments. How Hax was treated is prejudicial against those with mental illness. If Leffen was mentally ill when he made the videos he made about Hungrybox, even if he said the exact same things, he would have been banned for it.

        Hungrybox would have feared for his safety, and things like crabgate would have triggered a ban if Leffen had managed to evade one.

        I know what you’re going to say – and yes Leffen didn’t start the hate against Hungrybox, and I never said that he did. But he was the only person making video after video on it, Mango hated Hungrybox but he wasn’t making videos and trying to get the ruleset changed. Many members of the community hated Puff, and Mango hated Hungrybox, but Mango treated Hungrybox with respect when it mattered most, while Leffen refused to shake hands or fistbump after sets and was using thumbnails in his videos of Hungrybox photoshopped to look like the devil. If there is one person that did the most to fan the flames of hate against Hungrybox it was Leffen.

        As to the viewership pull – if you think TO’s don’t care about viewership I don’t know what to say, you are obviously divorced from reality. TOs care about viewership and additionally they care about top player turnout, which influences turnout in general. Leffen is worth more to them in terms of these two reasons than Hax, and the bias towards Leffen from the community in general was clear as day. It is this bias that resulted in Hax being accused of lying about Leffen and them forcing an apology on him, when he did not lie, the things he accused Leffen of doing, Leffen actually did. That’s what made the case so difficult for the community, and it was easiest to just shirk the mentally ill person aside and cover it all up, pretending that Leffen didn’t actually do any of the things he did and hope Hax just fades away… Only to act like he was a beloved member of the community after he died, when in fact he had been banned from it and many people wished he would be forgotten.

        Like

      2. “His allegations are correct” No Leffen is not orchestrating multiple community wide conspiracies. Nor has this been proven correct or evidence exists for it.

        ““The Truth” is showing that his accusations were made in good-faith and were not defamatory” Hax literally stated Leffen was a psychopath orchestrating multiple community wide conspiracies. in “the truth” he literally states Hax commited crimes. Thats on the low end of defamatory things Hax has said about Leffen. Why are you willfully lying?

        “Hax did not defame Leffen as he did not lie, and his going after Leffen was not malicious or constitute harrasment.” You have no idea what the definition of any of these words are do you? How can you even say Hax was not lying when you have no idea what his allegations even were. They were clear with bogus evidence based massive leaps of logic. Making crap up is a lie. Even if Hax is under a delusion it does not change the fact it was malicious, and hax refused to stop making more videos for about half a year. You have not seen any of them have you?

        “The fact that Leffen did not face any consequences for his going after Hungrybox personally with multiple videos in a similar way to Hax did (minus the mental illness) proves that Hax was not banned for those reasons but for political ones.” In reality its very difficult to get banned for slander. It would have to be a extreme case.

        Leffen did not in fact declare the Hbox was a psychopath orchestrating multiple community wide conspiracies. In reality they are not comparable. Hax was banned because he refused to stop and it looked like he was about to shoot up a school. Again, you neither saw Leffens video nor Hax’s.

        Arguing mental illness is a weak argument. You can’t argue it was just a 5 month mania episode, that is just his normal. He didn’t screw up once, he refused to stop for 5 months straight.

        I get your a drama tourist but Hate on Hbox was not caused by Leffen, nor crabgate caused by Leffen either.

        “he was the only person making video after video on it” Why lie?

        “If there is one person that did the most to fan the flames of hate against Hungrybox it was Leffen.” based on fanfiction. People hated Hbox because he was a much less nice person in the past. Much of the community had bad interactions with him. Even Hax publically hated Hbox.

        “As to the viewership pull – if you think TO’s don’t care about viewership I don’t know what to say, you are obviously divorced from reality.” Most majors don’t even run the twitch stream or upload video on their own channel. There is no money in smash.

        In reality Hax was not forced to make 14 apologies, he decided to do that on his own.

        In reality most people wanted Hax unbanned, including TO’s, publically stated this but he kept restating that his only issue was his wording, and nothing else. You don’t even know what Hax claimed Leffen did. Yet you are here claiming there a conspiracy against Hax when Hax refused to stop restating his allegations. That is the TO stated reason Hax was banned. If Leffen refused to stop making slander videos Against Hbox in response to negative backlash, he would have been banned too. This is not complicated. Hax competed for over a year that didnt even stop him from making more slander. In fact Leffen not the only person Hax would go after and slander too.

        “You can argue he recanted his apology to Leffen but he did not recant his apology and remorse over his behavior in general.” WTF? you think there is a difference? His apology was literally to leffen. He deleted all his apologies. He kept doing his behavior in general. Just because Hax was under delusion does not make it fact. There is now third 3 opened scape goat to reality.

        Like

      3. In fact Hax’s actual “we hanged for years” friends said Hax refused to have a relationship or spend time with each other outside of smash. Sorry but you can make friends outside of your profession or hobby, to say otherwise is just crazy talk.

        I have not found any other way to get to you.

        If you think this is crazy talk, sry but you are stupid asf.
        Do you seriously think it’s that easy to find real friends outside of the profession or hobby you’re into? It’s different for everyone, my dear, I probably have a verbal diarrhea syndrome. How can someone be so petty and just assume that it’s the same for everyone? If you can’t even understand such simple things, how am I supposed to take anything you write seriously?

        Like

      4. Reply to Jinx –

        Hax’s friends literally offered to hang out with Hax outside of smash. Hax rejected to spend time with his friends. Hax and his friends Have said this. Both random friends and celebrities in the community.

        Like

  22. Very good article.

    I think it’s worth mentioning that Hax said in his apology videos that he dealt with PTSD.

    I think he also said he got that from the smashboards posts.

    I think people blaming the TOs for his death are being dishonest. There’s likely a desire to put the blame on something to try and absolve themselves, when they really should have been the to help him with his issues that he was talking about and were clearly on display.

    Like

  23. […] I shared my post about the deceased Super Smash Bros. Melee player Aziz “Hax$” Al-Yami, I expected being told to […]

    Like

  24. You really wrote a hit peace on a dead guy? He was fucking 16 when he made those old posts. He made mistakes like everyone. You fucking weasel, what is wrong with you?

    Like

  25. I swear, if I see more people complaining about how Technicals “manipulate” narratives then I’m not going to hear them out unless the same people who point it out do the same job of researching and proving what they claim to the truth.

    The melee community / TOs did screw up in this whole ordeal, Hax$ was mocked and in a bad position, is that part a lie ?

    Who shed light on this issue : Technicals.

    He wouldn’t have the reach he currently has if people didn’t act self righteous while leaving so much troublesome stuff behind them that caused other to suffer the consequence.

    Maybe do what he does, prove it with actual pieces of evidence instead of your traditionnal “he’s not trustworthy, a massive liar”

    Hax$ funerals may not be good to watch but does not diminish the failure of the community Hax$ wanted to be part of.

    Rest in peace Hax$, even in death people still try to avoid tackling your subject and it’s disgusting.

    Like

    1. Technicals she light on the issue by declaring there is a deep state against Hax, and directly fed Hax;s delusions both publically and in private talks to him. Technicals made sure that people were harassed, which did nothing to help Hax. In fact Technical told Hax nothing he said was wrong and fed into his delusons, telling Hax he just needs to beg even harder, he said this after Hax was perma banned months before his death.

      Despite this you have the gall to pretent technicals remotely helped Hax.

      Here is a basic thing Technicals lied about. He lied about why Hax was banned, He lied proclaiming Hax never did anything wrong, he then proclaimed he should have any been banned briefly, while lying aboyt Hax only being banned for the first video, not because of Hax;s 14 seperate videos and several essays. Technicals lied about Ban statements saying why Hax is banned. Technicals lied about telling Hax to stop making videos, even know technicals also released DM’s telling Hax he did nothing wrong and just needs to beg harder. Technicals ignored most of the ban statements, He refused to admit any of the private interactions Hax had with TO’s happened. Technicals lied saying Hax was only unbanned in his locals, when Hax was attending several majors and regionals outside of NYC. Techncials also managed to make Hax death about defending people banned for hate speech.

      Like

  26. The person who wrote this blog post 1) doesn’t have empathy for people who struggling with mental health, as it detail a character assasination just after that said person died.

    Also, 2) clearly the author of the post didn’t read Leffen’s wikipedia where it says that he liked to be view as the Smash Community villain. You can argue all you want about if Hax permanent ban was right, but the thing is that Leffen was a toxic player, and nobody did anything about it, except for a one year ban in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leffen

    Smash veterans have posted on their x account the same thing, Leffen’s toxic behavior impacted the community, and hax death should be make us reflect that being a bully isn’t something people should make excuses for or even ignore.

    Like

    1. Hax did not accuse leffen of being a bully. He declared Leffen was orchestrating dozen+ conspiracies because in Hax’s words Leffen was evil. Hax was the person attacking a community members, not Leffen. Hax went way more people then just Leffen.

      You have never watched Hax’s videos or nor know what he claimed or even the stated reason Hax was banned.

      You have no idea Hax was unbaned by many tournaments, was not a perma ban untill he relaped restating his allegations.

      Like

  27. This isnt nice. You aren’t an arm chair psychiatrist. If you think this is ok literally just change hax to a family or friend and you will get pissed.

    Like

Leave a reply to caste Cancel reply